Both employee and manager loyalty has always been considered a good thing. So what’s changed? When does being loyal long-term, at all costs, go from a virtue to a liability?
Here are some important questions to consider when thinking about manager loyalty:
The New Employee Dilemma
The easiest solution is to ask new employees to deal with the old employees. But is this really the new employee’s job? And, why would they want to do that? Do they have the skills to do that? Is this the optimal approach? In effect, we are asking new employees to do the manager’s job without the manager’s authority or influence. In their early stages, we are asking new employees to ‘box by tying one hand behind their back’. At best, it is a workaround with no good resolution. At worst, it is management abdication. In a zero-unemployment environment, why would new employees want to do that without extra ‘battle pay’ for having to do their manager’s job?
No doubt about it, as a manager, being loyal to employees is a good thing. But in the dynamics of a growth organization, when new employees are brought on for their expertise and motivation, a manager’s over-tolerant loyalty to a dysfunctional long-term employee will create problems on many levels. Below is an organizational impact assessment.
Organizational Impact: Consequences of Not Addressing Issues with Existing Employees
The dysfunctional, long-term employee wins because they can’t or won’t change to meet the growth needs of the organization. What impact does this have on corporate culture that allows dysfunction to exist with maximum management tolerance and minimal management intervention?
New employee onboarding and growth acceleration can be compromised or decelerated by the passive behavior of the dysfunctional employee and the absent manager.
New employees need to engage in ‘work arounds’ to accommodate the ‘nuances’ of the tolerated dysfunctional employee, which should never be the case.
New employees wonder about the management ability of the manager, who in reality, is not managing but is denying the situation and relying on a management strategy of hope and luck. This is never a great management strategy.
What Can Develop from Well-intentioned Loyalty?
Business growth is compromised by the long-term and now dysfunctional employee who blocks the optimization of business goals to accommodate personal work preferences.
The long-term employee is stuck in an old reality. While the new work environment is the current reality, the long-term employee is allowed to ‘barely function’ with skills that are fast becoming stale and depreciating. The manager is allowing that employee to depreciate by not developing an employee with relevant skills needed in the new work environment.
The new employee, hired for their current skills, will likely become demoralized, demotivated, sub optimized and eventually leave. From a business perspective, the manager will have created a suboptimal business environment, not by design but by management default.
Today, manager loyalty is a good thing, but loyalty exists in a multidimensional world where true loyalty must be evaluated as it applies to all employees, to management, to business goals, and to owner, shareholders and investors. Managers, it may be time to consider manager loyalty and rethink how you define it.
If you're interested in learning more about the importance of strategic leadership and change management as it relates to new and existing employee development, I invite you to download our recent eBook, The Multifunctional Approach to Transformative Leadership. The eBook focuses on employee transition, aligning employees and the change process, personality profiling, and much more.